What Shell’s Appeal Victory Means for Scope 3 Emissions

Share
Shell has successfully overturned a Dutch court ruling to cut emissions by 45% before 2030
Shell has successfully overturned a Dutch court ruling to cut emissions by 45% before 2030, reigniting debate on Scope 3 emissions

Shell’s success in overturning a Dutch court’s ruling requiring it to slash emissions by nearly half by 2030 has reignited debate around one of the thorniest issues in climate action: Scope 3 emissions.

These emissions, generated by the use of oil and gas products, are a major contributor to global carbon footprints but remain challenging to tackle within corporate frameworks.

A 2021 decision had mandated Shell to reduce absolute carbon emissions by 45% from 2019 levels, including its operational emissions (Scope 1 and 2) and the vast majority of its carbon output – Scope 3.

However, a Dutch court reversed that judgment, recognising the complexity of holding a company responsible for emissions tied to customer use of its products.

Youtube Placeholder

Scope 3 emissions represent between 80 and 95% of total emissions for oil and gas companies, yet they fall largely outside their direct control.

Unlike Scope 1 and 2 emissions – which stem from company operations and energy use – Scope 3 relies on the actions of consumers and partner businesses.

Cyril Widdershoven, an analyst at Strategy International, highlighted the lack of legal clarity around holding firms accountable for these emissions.

He said: “The main outcome to be looked at is the fact that the Dutch court has revoked or thrown out the issue that a company like Shell should be looking at Scope 3 emissions.”

Cyril Widdershoven, Analyst, Strategy International

Shell, for its part, argued that forcing it to take unilateral action could backfire. In a statement, the company said such a move would not reduce customer demand for fuels like petrol, diesel and gas but instead push consumers toward other providers, potentially with worse environmental records.

This stance aligns with broader energy market realities. Fossil fuels, despite growing renewable energy adoption, still accounted for 84% of global energy in 2023, according to the Statistical Review of World Energy. Natural gas, often seen as a bridge fuel, faces disruptions that could see power plants reverting to coal – a far more polluting alternative.

Net zero commitments under scrutiny

Shell and many of its peers have made public pledges to align with net zero emissions goals by 2050. The Oil and Gas Decarbonisation Charter (OGDC), which Shell signed last year, focuses on reducing methane emissions and adopting cleaner technologies.

However, it does not mandate action on Scope 3 emissions.

Bjorn Sverdrup, the OGDC’s head, commented on these challenges at last week’s Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference (Adipec). He suggested that while companies might adjust their climate efforts in the short term, the overall direction toward net-zero remains intact.

“There may be short-term adjustments … but I think the long-term direction is set, and it’s all a question about pace,” Bjorn said. “I think there is eagerness to speed things up rather than slow things down.”

Bjorn Sverdrup, Chair, OGDC

Still, industry pressures persist. Regulators, investors and consumers are demanding stronger environmental commitments. 

The broader implications of the ruling

While the ruling is a relief for Shell, it has sparked concern among climate activists.

“While we mourn today’s setback, the ruling establishes a responsibility for big oil and gas to act that future litigation can build on,” comments Laurie van der Burg of Oil Change International - an advocacy organisation focused on exposing the environmental cost of fossil fuels. 

As developing economies like India drive energy demand, organisations predict the need for trillions in oil and gas investment to meet future consumption. However, these projections clash with mounting pressure to limit global temperature rise and transition to renewables.

The Shell case serves as a reminder of the challenges inherent in balancing corporate interests, legal obligations and global climate goals. It also highlights the urgency for international agreements to tackle Scope 3 emissions in a meaningful way.


Receive the next edition of Scope 3 Magazine by signing up for its newsletter

As part of this portfolio, make sure you check out Procurement Magazine and also sign up to our global conference series - Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE.


Scope 3 Magazine is a BizClik brand. 

Share

Featured Articles

Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania join the European grid, cutting ties with Russian energy, a move that boosts regional security and sustainability

TÜV SÜD: New battery regulations bring Scope 3 hurdles, requiring sustainable sourcing, digital traceability and design changes increasing compliance

Nissan is scaling up its use of green steel, reducing CO2 emissions in its supply chain as part of its goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050