Exploring the Carbon Cost of Christmas Trees

Share
The Christmas tree market necessitates the felling of millions of pines every year - can this ever be sustainable? | Credit: The Nature Conservancy
Artificial Christmas trees have long been a favourite for many households and offices - but could these be increasing your carbon footprint?

As the festive season draws closer, the age-old debate resurfaces: should you opt for a real Christmas tree or an artificial one?

While artificial trees may seem convenient and cost-effective, environmental experts argue that real trees are the greener choice. But the reasons for this preference go beyond the obvious.

The environmental impact of artificial trees

Artificial Christmas trees have long been a favourite for many households, especially in the United States, where about 10 million are sold each year. Despite their popularity, their environmental cost is strikingly high.

Research from Carbon Trust highlights the carbon footprint of artificial trees: “a two-metre artificial tree has a carbon footprint of around 40kg, more than 10 times that of a real tree that’s burned after Christmas.” This significant impact stems from how artificial trees are made.

Most are manufactured from polyvinyl chloride (PVC), a plastic derived from fossil fuels. The production process is energy-intensive, involving petrochemicals that release greenhouse gases.

Additionally, the majority of artificial trees are made in China, requiring long-distance shipping that further amplifies their carbon footprint.

When it comes to disposal, the outlook is equally bleak. Artificial trees are usually non-recyclable due to their mixed-material composition, meaning they end up in landfills. Once there, they degrade very slowly, contributing to long-term environmental damage.

The National Christmas Tree Association says that, for every tree felled, Christmas tree farmers plant between one to three new seedlings | Credit: The Nature Conservancy

The hidden benefits of real trees

By contrast, real Christmas trees offer numerous environmental advantages, starting with their role in sustainable forestry. In the US, between 350 and 500 million Christmas trees are grown on dedicated farms, with around 30 million harvested annually.

The National Christmas Tree Association notes that every tree cut down is replaced by one to three seedlings, ensuring a steady cycle of regeneration. These farms also provide habitats for wildlife and preserve soil health, fostering biodiversity.

Tree farming also plays a critical role in land conservation. With increasing pressures to convert farmland for other uses, Christmas tree farms help protect these spaces from development. By keeping this land agriculturally productive, the industry maintains an ecological balance that might otherwise be lost.

Living trees offer even more direct environmental benefits. As they grow, they absorb carbon dioxide and release oxygen, acting as natural carbon sinks. This process helps combat climate change, making real trees an eco-friendly alternative to their synthetic counterparts.

Disposal and beyond: The end-of-life advantage

Real trees also shine when it comes to disposal. Many communities provide recycling services for used Christmas trees, turning them into mulch, erosion barriers, or habitats for wildlife. This repurposing ensures that even after the festivities, real trees can continue to benefit the environment.

On the other hand, artificial trees rarely have a sustainable end-of-life pathway. Their mixed materials make recycling impractical, leaving them to languish in landfills for decades.

Youtube Placeholder

Supporting sustainable forestry

Some question whether cutting down trees for decoration contradicts conservation efforts. 

However, sustainable forestry practices have shown the opposite to be true. Certification programmes such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) ensure that Christmas tree farming balances economic needs with ecological health.

Properly managed tree farms can sequester as much carbon as natural forests, according to experts. They also serve as a commercial safeguard for privately owned forested land, which accounts for over half of the forested areas in the US.

Without the economic incentive provided by tree farming, landowners may resort to deforestation for development. By purchasing real trees from sustainably managed farms, consumers actively support forest conservation and biodiversity.

It's estimated that between 350-500 million Christmas trees are growing in the US alone, with around 30 million harvested each year | Credit: The Nature Conservancy

A greener festive season

While artificial trees may seem like a practical choice, their environmental drawbacks are significant.

Real trees, by comparison, offer ecological benefits that extend from growth to disposal. As living organisms, they play a vital role in combating climate change, supporting wildlife and preserving farmland.

For those seeking an eco-friendly Christmas, opting for a sustainably farmed real tree is the best choice.


Make sure you check out the latest industry news and insights at Scope 3 Magazine and be part of the conversation at our global conference series, Sustainability LIVE and Procurement & Supply Chain LIVE.

Discover all our upcoming events and secure your tickets today. Subscribe to the Scope 3 Magazine newsletter.


Scope 3 Magazine is a BizClik brand. 

Share

Featured Articles

Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania join the European grid, cutting ties with Russian energy, a move that boosts regional security and sustainability

TÜV SÜD: New battery regulations bring Scope 3 hurdles, requiring sustainable sourcing, digital traceability and design changes increasing compliance

Nissan is scaling up its use of green steel, reducing CO2 emissions in its supply chain as part of its goal to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050